

I could be completely wrong here but you might just be out of luck in getting something faster unless you can provide more information of have some kind of relationship between the polynomials generated at each step. There is insufficient information available to consider calculating just a subset of roots of the derivative polynomial - how could you know which derivative root provides the maximum stationary point of the polynomial without comparing the function value at ALL of the derivative roots? If your polynomial coefficients were being perturbed at each step by only a (bounded) small amount or in a predictable manner, then it is conceivable that you would be able to try something iterative to refine the solution at each step (for example something crude such as using your previous roots as starting point of a new set of newton iterations to identify the updated derivative roots), but the question does not suggest that this is in fact the case so I am just guessing. If the coefficients of the polynomial change at every time step in an arbitrary fashion, then ultimately you are faced with a distinct and unrelated optimisation problem at every stage. Unambiguously interpreted as convex or concave are accepted: Only those values of p which can reasonably and X^p and x.^p, where x is a real variable and and p The polynomial must be affine, convex, or concave, and Polyval(x,p) constructs a polynomial function of the variable

For irrational values of p, a nearby rational is selected Represents these functions exactly when \(p\) is a rational ( e.g., norm(x,p)) are marked with a double dagger (‡).

Functions involving powers ( e.g., x^p) and \(p\)-norms.As this section discusses, this is an experimentalĪpproach that works well in many cases, but cannot be guaranteed. Of the successive approximation method, a warning will be issued. Solver, achieving the same final precision.

Other solvers, these functions are handled using a successiveĪpproximation method which makes multiple calls to the underlying Most effectively by Mosek, the only bundled solver with support for theĮxponential cone upon which these functions are constructed. Models incorporating these functions will be solved Functions marked with a dagger (†) are not supported natively by manu.Place certain restrictions or caveats on their use: In some cases, limitations of the underlying solver In this section we describe each operator, function, set, and command that you are
